tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28172905.post777701891464553701..comments2024-03-03T17:53:46.947-05:00Comments on (x, why?): A Rational Approach(x, why?)http://www.blogger.com/profile/17499160002806879025noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28172905.post-32972298023011555742014-05-29T13:19:53.411-04:002014-05-29T13:19:53.411-04:00Short answer: female-ish numerical characters, mee...Short answer: female-ish numerical characters, meeting a new, mysterious figure (double meaning, that!), as opposed to poor Fivex Underbar, whom they find to be a bit annoying and wish would go away.(x, why?)https://www.blogger.com/profile/17499160002806879025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28172905.post-85421973612596131812014-05-29T08:56:35.126-04:002014-05-29T08:56:35.126-04:00I don't see why sqrt(5) needs to move along. T...I don't see why sqrt(5) needs to move along. There's an infinite sequence of rationals 2, 5/2, .. approaching sqrt(5). There's plenty of room for numbers, it just gets crowded for the Numerals representing.<br /><br />I am pleased the "prove you're not a robot" text challenge for this comment is all numeric and ends with photo 5.William Rickerhttp://m.twitter.com/n1vuxnoreply@blogger.com